Friday, August 31, 2012

Tamoxifen Citrate



Class: Antineoplastic Agents
VA Class: AN500
Chemical Name: 2-Hydroxy-1,2,3-propanetricarboxylate-(Z)-2-[4-(1,2-diphyl-1-butenyl)phenoxy]-N,Ndimethyl ethanamine
Molecular Formula: C26H29NO•C6H8O7
CAS Number: 54965-24-1
Brands: Nolvadex



  • For women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and women at high risk for breast cancer: serious and life-threatening events associated with tamoxifen in the risk reduction setting include uterine malignancies, stroke, and pulmonary embolism.a Incidence rates for these events have been estimated from the NSABP P-1 trial (median length of follow-up 6.9 years).a


    Uterine malignancies consist of both endometrial adenocarcinoma (incidence rate per 1000 women-years of 2.2 for tamoxifen versus 0.71 for placebo) and uterine sarcoma (incidence rate per 1000 women-years of 0.17 for tamoxifen versus 0 for placebo).


    For stroke, the incidence rate per 1000 women-years was 1.43 for tamoxifen versus 1 for placebo.a


    For pulmonary embolism, the incidence rate per 1000 women-years was 0.75 for tamoxifen versus 0.25 for placebo.a




  • Health care providers should discuss the potential benefits versus the potential risks of these serious events with women at high risk of breast cancer and women with DCIS considering tamoxifen to reduce their risk of developing breast cancer.a




  • The benefits of tamoxifen outweigh its risks in women already diagnosed with breast cancer.a




Introduction

A nonsteroidal estrogen agonist-antagonist; an antineoplastic agent.128


Uses for Tamoxifen Citrate


Breast Cancer


An adjuvant to surgery and radiation therapy for the treatment of breast cancer in women with negative axillary lymph nodes and in postmenopausal women with positive axillary lymph nodes.110 121 128 130 133 136 194 195 196 198 204 205 253 254 258 Also reduces the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer in these women.128 253 254 258


Reduction of risk of invasive breast cancer in patients with DCIS following surgery and radiation therapy.a


Palliative treatment of metastatic breast cancer in men and women.128 An alternative to ovarian ablative therapy (oopherectomy or radiation) in premenopausal women.128 133 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 183


Reduction in the incidence of breast cancer in women at high risk for developing the disease.128 293


Albright’s Syndrome


Has been used to reduce the frequency of vaginal bleeding episodes and to reduce the rate of increase in bone age in girls with Albright’s syndrome (McCune-Albright syndrome) and precocious puberty.a


Long-term effects not established.a


Tamoxifen Citrate Dosage and Administration


General



  • Consult specialized references for procedures for proper handling and disposal of antineoplastic drugs.



Administration


Administered orally as a single daily dose or in divided doses; dosages exceeding 20 mg daily should be given in divided doses (morning and evening).128


Initiate therapy during menstruation when used to reduce the incidence of breast cancer in sexually active women.a In women with menstrual irregularity, a negative β-human chorionic gonadotropin test immediately prior to therapy is sufficient.a


Dosage


Available as tamoxifen citrate; dosage expressed in terms of tamoxifen.128


Adults


Breast Cancer

Adjuvant Therapy

Oral

20–40 mg daily.100 102 110 121 128 129 130 194 195 196 205 Current data from clinical studies support 5 years of adjuvant therapy.128 194 195 196 253 254 256 257 291 328


Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

Oral

20 mg daily for 5 years.a


Metastatic Breast Cancer

Oral

20–40 mg daily.128


Reduction in the Incidence of Breast Cancer in Women at High Risk

Oral

20 mg daily for 5 years.128 270 284 291


Prescribing Limits


Adults


Breast Cancer

Adjuvant Therapy

Oral

No evidence that dosages >20 mg daily are more effective.112 128


Cautions for Tamoxifen Citrate


Contraindications



  • Known hypersensitivity to tamoxifen or any ingredient in the formulation.128




  • When used in women with DCIS and women at high risk for breast cancer, history of DVT or pulmonary embolism.a




  • When used in women with DCIS and women at high risk for breast cancer, concurrent anticoagulant therapy with a warfarin derivative.a 278 293 309



Warnings/Precautions


Warnings


Hypercalcemia

Hypercalcemia reported in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have bone metastases.128 129 If hypercalcemia occurs, take appropriate measures; if severe, discontinue tamoxifen.128


Effects on the Uterus

Increased incidence of uterine malignancies, sometimes fatal, reported.128 330 Most uterine malignancies have been classified as adenocarcinoma of the endometrium; rare uterine sarcomas also reported.128 330 (See Boxed Warning.) Gynecologic symptoms (i.e., menstrual irregularities, abnormal vaginal bleeding, changes in vaginal discharge, pelvic pain or pressure) should be promptly evaluated.128 163 183


Endometrial changes, including hyperplasias and polyps, endometriosis and uterine fibroids reported.128 180 258 259 274 Ovarian cysts reported in a small number of premenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.128


Cardiovascular Effects

Increased incidence of thromboembolic events, including DVT128 293 and pulmonary embolism; 269 270 293 stroke also reported.128 269 277 293 Some cases of stroke and pulmonary emboli have been fatal.128 (See Boxed Warning.) Concomitant use with chemotherapy may increase incidence of these events.128


Hepatic Effects

Liver cancer reported.128


Changes in AST, ALT, bilirubin and/or alkaline phosphatase concentrations reported; severe hepatic abnormalities including fatty changes in the liver, cholestasis, hepatitis, and hepatic necrosis (some fatal) reported rarely.128


Ocular Effects

Visual disturbances, decrement in color vision perception, corneal changes, cataracts, optic neuritis, retinal vein thrombosis, intraretinal crystals, posterior subcapsular opacities, and/or retinopathy reported.128 190 191 192 193 258 268 326


Fetal/Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality

May cause fetal harm.128 If inadvertently used during pregnancy or if patient becomes pregnant, apprise of potential fetal hazard, including possible long-term risk of a diethylstilbestrol-like syndrome.128


General Precautions


Hematologic Effects

Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, pancytopenia, and leukopenia reported; caution in patients with leukopenia or thrombocytopenia.128 Periodic CBCs, including platelet count recommended.128


Specific Populations


Pregnancy

Category D.128 (See Fetal/Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality under Cautions.)


Lactation

Not known whether tamoxifen is distributed into milk.128 Discontinue nursing or the drug because of potential risk to nursing infant.128


Pediatric Use

Safety and efficacy in girls 2–10 years of age with Albright’s syndrome and precocious puberty not studied beyond 1 year; long-term effects not established and continued monitoring recommended.a (See Special Populations under Pharmacokinetics.)


Geriatric Use

No substantial differences in safety and efficacy relative to younger adults.a


Common Adverse Effects


Hot flashes, vaginal discharge, menstrual irregularities, weight loss.128


Interactions for Tamoxifen Citrate


A substrate of CYP3A, 2C9, 2D6.a


Effect of tamoxifen on drugs that require mixed function oxidases for activation unknown.a


Cytotoxic Agents


Increased risk of thromboembolic events.128


Specific Drugs







































Drug



Interaction



Comments



Aminoglutethimide



Decreased plasma tamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen concentrations128



Anticoagulants (e.g., warfarin)



Enhanced warfarin effects128 170 171 172



Careful monitoring of PT is recommended128 170 171 172


When used in women with DCIS or at high risk for breast cancer, concomitant use contraindicateda



Bromocriptine



Increased plasma tamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen concentrations128



Cyclosporine



Competitively inhibited formation of N-desmethyltamoxifen in vitroa



Clinicial importance unknowna



Diltiazem



Competitively inhibited formation of N-desmethyltamoxifen in vitroa



Clinicial importance unknowna



Erythromycin



Competitively inhibited formation of N-desmethyltamoxifen in vitroa



Clinicial importance unknowna



Letrozole



Decreased plasma letrozole concentrationsa



Medroxyprogesterone



Decreased plasma N-desmethyltamoxifen concentrations but did not reduce plasma tamoxifen concentrationsa



Nifedipine



Competitively inhibited formation of N-desmethyltamoxifen in vitroa



Clinicial importance unknowna



Phenobarbital



Decreased plasma tamoxifen concentrations128



Clinical importance unknown128



Rifampin



Decreased plasma tamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen concentrationsa


Tamoxifen Citrate Pharmacokinetics


Absorption


Bioavailability


Absorbed slowly following oral administration; peak serum concentrations of tamoxifen occur about 3–6 hours after a single dose.128 137 138 139 140 141


Plasma Concentrations


Steady-state concentrations of tamoxifen are attained after 3–4 weeks and those of N-desmethyltamoxifen, an active metabolite, are attained after 3–8 weeks.128 137 140 143 145


Distribution


Extent


Not fully characterized.128


Not known whether tamoxifen is distributed into milk.128


Elimination


Metabolism


Rapidly and extensively metabolized.26 28 140 142 143 144 145 146 148 149 150 151 The major metabolite, N-desmethyltamoxifen,128 140 143 144 145 146 148 150 151 has biologic activity similar to that of the parent drug.128


Elimination Route


Excreted principally in feces as polar conjugates.128


Half-life


Tamoxifen: 5–7 days.28 137 139 145


N-Desmethyltamoxifen: 9–14 days.128 139 145


Special Populations


Clearance higher in female children 2–10 years of age than in women; exposure to N-desmethyltamoxifen in these pediatric patients similar to adults.a


Stability


Storage


Oral


Tablets

Well-closed, light-resistant containers 20–25°C.128


ActionsActions



  • Acts as an estrogen antagonist on breast tissue and in the CNS and as an estrogen agonist on endometrium, bone, and lipids.311




  • In breast epithelial tissue, increases production of inhibitory factors and decreases production of stimulatory factors that influence breast cell growth.271 286 287 323




  • Reduces bone resorption and bone turnover.265 266 267 316




  • Decreases total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations.318 319 320 Less favorably, decreases HDL-cholesterol concentrations and increases triglyceride concentrations.318 319 320




  • Acts as an estrogen agonist on the uterus and exhibits proliferative and tumor-promoting effects on the endometrium.311



Advice to Patients



  • Importance of receiving routine gynecologic care and of immediately informing clinician if any new breast lumps or abnormal gynecologic symptoms, including abnormal vaginal bleeding, change in vaginal discharge, menstrual irregularities, or pelvic pain/pressure occur.128 163 183




  • Importance of informing clinician of any changes in vision.128 190 191 192 193 258 268




  • Importance of immediately informing clinician of unexplained shortness of breath or leg swelling/tenderness.128




  • Importance of periodic monitoring, including liver function test monitoring and blood counts.128




  • Advise patients at high risk of breast cancer that tamoxifen may decrease the incidence of breast cancer, but may not eliminate the risk of the disease.128




  • Importance of women informing clinicians immediately if they are or plan to become pregnant; importance of avoiding pregnancy during therapy;119 128 243 importance of using effective nonhormonal contraception while receiving tamoxifen and for 2 months after discontinuing the drug.a Necessity of advising pregnant patients of the risk to the fetus.128




  • Importance of reading the medication guide; the guide is for women using tamoxifen to lower their risk of breast cancer or with DCIS.128




  • Importance of informing clinicians of existing or contemplated concomitant therapy, including prescription and OTC drugs.128




  • Importance of women informing clinicians if they are or plan to breast-feed.128




  • Importance of informing patients of other important precautionary information.128 (See Cautions.)



Preparations


Excipients in commercially available drug preparations may have clinically important effects in some individuals; consult specific product labeling for details.


* available from one or more manufacturer, distributor, and/or repackager by generic (nonproprietary) name




























Tamoxifen Citrate

Routes



Dosage Forms



Strengths



Brand Names



Manufacturer



Oral



Tablets



10 mg (of tamoxifen)*



Nolvadex



AstraZeneca



Tamoxifen Citrate Tablets



Aegis, Andrx, Barr, Mylan, Roxane, Teva



20 mg (of tamoxifen)*



Nolvadex



AstraZeneca



Tamoxifen Citrate Tablets



Aegis, Andrx, Barr, Mylan, Roxane, Teva


Comparative Pricing


This pricing information is subject to change at the sole discretion of DS Pharmacy. This pricing information was updated 03/2011. Actual costs to patients will vary depending on the use of specific retail or mail-order locations and health insurance copays.


Nolvadex 20MG Tablets (ASTRAZENECA): 30/$120.99 or 60/$239.98


Tamoxifen Citrate 20MG Tablets (TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA): 30/$21.99 or 90/$49.97



Disclaimer

This report on medications is for your information only, and is not considered individual patient advice. Because of the changing nature of drug information, please consult your physician or pharmacist about specific clinical use.


The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. and Drugs.com represent that the information provided hereunder was formulated with a reasonable standard of care, and in conformity with professional standards in the field. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. and Drugs.com make no representations or warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any implied warranty of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose, with respect to such information and specifically disclaims all such warranties. Users are advised that decisions regarding drug therapy are complex medical decisions requiring the independent, informed decision of an appropriate health care professional, and the information is provided for informational purposes only. The entire monograph for a drug should be reviewed for a thorough understanding of the drug's actions, uses and side effects. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. and Drugs.com do not endorse or recommend the use of any drug. The information is not a substitute for medical care.

AHFS Drug Information. © Copyright, 1959-2011, Selected Revisions July 2006. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc., 7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.


† Use is not currently included in the labeling approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.




References


Only references cited for selected revisions after 1984 are available electronically.



26. Fromson JM, Sharp DS. The selective uptake of tamoxifen by human uterine tissue. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Comm. 1974; 81:321-3.



28. Fromson JM, Pearson S. The metabolism of tamoxifen (I.C.I. 46,474). Part II: in female patients. Xenobiotica. 1973; 3:711-4. [PubMed 4783632]



100. Nolvadex Adjuvant Trial Organisation. Controlled trial of tamoxifen as adjuvant agent in management of early breast cancer: interim analysis at four years. Lancet. 1983; 1:257-61. [IDIS 164603] [PubMed 6130291]



101. Nolvadex Adjuvant Trial Organisation. Improved survival amongst patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen after mastectomy for early breast cancer. Lancet. 1983; 2:450.



102. Ribeiro G, Palmer MK. Adjuvant tamoxifen for operable carcinoma of the breast: report of clinical trial by the Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute. BMJ. 1983; 286:827-30. [IDIS 168605] [PubMed 6403101]



103. Brinkley D. Adjuvant questions. BMJ. 1984; 288:1709-10. [PubMed 6428507]



104. Patterson JS, Battersby LA, Bach BK. Use of tamoxifen in advanced male breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rep. 1980; 64:801-4. [PubMed 7427964]



105. Becher R, Höffken K, Pape H et al. Tamoxifen treatment before orchiectomy in advanced breast cancer in men. N Engl J Med. 1981; 305:169-70. [IDIS 133415] [PubMed 7242589]



106. Hortobagyi GN, Distefano A, Legha SS et al. Hormonal therapy with tamoxifen in male breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rep. 1979; 63:539-41. [IDIS 112371] [PubMed 221118]



107. Stathopoulos GP, Karvountzis GG, Yiotis J. Tamoxifen in carcinoid syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1981; 305:52. [IDIS 133352] [PubMed 7231519]



108. Myers CF, Ershler WB, Tannenbaum MA et al. Tamoxifen and carcinoid tumor. Ann Intern Med. 1982; 96:383. [IDIS 146199] [PubMed 7059114]



109. Moertel CG, Engstrom PF, Schutt AJ. Tamoxifen therapy for metastatic carcinoid tumor: a negative study. Ann Intern Med. 1984; 100:531-2. [IDIS 183832] [PubMed 6200021]



110. Nolvadex Adjuvant Trial Organisation. Controlled trial of tamoxifen as single adjuvant agent in management of early breast cancer: analysis at six years. Lancet. 1985; 1:836-40. [IDIS 199145] [PubMed 2858709]



111. Rose C, Thorpe SM, Andersen KW et al. Beneficial effect of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in primary breast cancer patients with high oestrogen receptor values. Lancet. 1985; 1:16-9. [PubMed 2856949]



112. National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research. Consensus conference: adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. JAMA. 1985; 254:3461-3. [IDIS 207936] [PubMed 4068189]



113. Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group. Randomised trial of chemo-endocrine therapy, endocrine therapy, and mastectomy alone in postmenopausal patients with operable breast cancer and axillary node metastasis. Lancet. 1984; 1:1256-60. [IDIS 186376] [PubMed 6144974]



114. Fisher B, Fisher ER, Redmond C. A brief overview of findings from NSABP trials of adjuvant therapy. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1984; 96:55-65. [PubMed 6101262]



115. Hubay CA, Gordon NH, Crowe JP et al. Antiestrogen-cytotoxic chemotherapy and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccination in stage II breast cancer: seventy-two-month follow-up. Surgery. 1984; 96:61-72. [PubMed 6740497]



116. Cummings FJ, Gray R, Davis TE et al. Adjuvant tamoxifen treatment of elderly women with Stage II breast cancer: a double-blind comparison with placebo. Ann Intern Med. 1985; 103:324-9. [IDIS 205815] [PubMed 3896085]



117. Gau T (Stuart Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE): Personal communication; 1986 Jan 13.



118. Kaiser-Kupfer MI, Lippman ME. Tamoxifen retinopathy. Cancer Treat Rep. 1978; 62:315-20. [PubMed 647693]



119. Diver JMJ, Jackson IM, Fitzgerald JD. Tamoxifen and non-malignant indications. Lancet. 1986; 1:733. [IDIS 213703] [PubMed 2870236]



120. Kaiser-Kupfer MI, Kupfer C, Rodrigues MM. Tamoxifen retinopathy: a clinicopathologic report. Ophthalmology. 1981; 88:89-93. [PubMed 7243233]



121. Report from the Breast Cancer Trials Committee, Scottish Cancer Trials Office (MRC), Edinburgh. Adjuvant tamoxifen in the management of operable breast cancer: the Scottish trial. Lancet. 1987; 2:171-5. [IDIS 233071] [PubMed 2885637]



122. Fisher B, Brown A, Wolmark N et al. Prolonging tamoxifen therapy for primary breast cancer: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Clinical Trial. Ann Intern Med. 1987; 106:649-54. [IDIS 229430] [PubMed 3551710]



123. Tormey DC. Long-term adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen in breast cancer: how long is long? Ann Intern Med. 1987; 106:762-4. Editorial.



124. Zielinski CC, Kubista E, Salzer H et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy combined with tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with stage II breast cancer. Lancet. 1986; 2:1164. [IDIS 223328] [PubMed 2877314]



125. Fentiman IS, Caleffi M, Brame E et al. Double-blind controlled trial of tamoxifen therapy for mastalgia. Lancet. 1986; 1:287-8. [IDIS 211071] [PubMed 2868162]



126. Fentiman IS. Tamoxifen and mastalgia: an emerging indication. Drugs. 1986; 32:477-80. [IDIS 223766] [PubMed 3539572]



127. Fisher B, Redmond C, Brown A et al. Influence of tumor estrogen and progesterone receptor levels on the response to tamoxifen and chemotherapy in primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1983; 1:227-41. [PubMed 6366135]



128. Zeneca Pharmaceuticals. Nolvadex (tamoxifen citrate) prescribing information. Wilmington, DE; 1998 Oct 28.



129. Legha SS. Tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1988; 109:219-28. [IDIS 244745] [PubMed 3291659]



130. National Cancer Institute. Clinical alert on breast cancer. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1988 May 18.



131. Bradbeer JW, Kyngdon J. Primary treatment of breast cancer in elderly women with tamoxifen. Clin Oncol. 1983; 9:31-4. [PubMed 6851305]



132. Taylor SG IV, Gelman RS, Falkson G et al. Combination chemotherapy compared to tamoxifen as initial therapy for stage IV breast cancer in elderly women. Ann Intern Med. 1986; 104:455-61. [IDIS 213853] [PubMed 3513684]



133. Glick JH. Meeting highlights: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988; 80:471-5. [PubMed 3367387]



134. Delozier T, Julien JP, Juret P et al. Adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer: preliminary results of a randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1986; 7:105-10. [PubMed 3521767]



135. Fisher B, Redmond C, Brown A et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with and without tamoxifen in the treatment of primary breast cancer: 5-year results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Trial. J Clin Oncol. 1986; 4:459-71. [PubMed 2856857]



136. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Effects of adjuvant tamoxifen and of cytotoxic therapy on mortality in early breast cancer: an overview of 61 randomized trials among 28,896 women. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319:1681-92. [IDIS 248808] [PubMed 3205265]



137. Fabian C, Sternson L, Barnett M. Clinical pharmacology of tamoxifen in patients with breast cancer: comparison of traditional and loading dose schedules. Cancer Treat Rep. 1980; 64:765-73. [PubMed 7427961]



138. Adam HK, Gay MA, Moore RH. Measurement of tamoxifen in serum by thin-layer densitometry. J Endocrinol. 1980; 84:35-42. [PubMed 7359080]



139. Adam HK, Patterson JS, Kemp JV. Studies on the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen in normal volunteers. Cancer Treat Rep. 1980; 64:761-4. [PubMed 7427960]



140. McVie JG, Simonetti GPC, Stevenson D et al. The bioavailability of Tamoplex(tamoxifen). Part 1: a pilot study. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1986; 8:505-12. [PubMed 3747644]



141. Wilkinson P, Ribeiro G, Adam H et al. Clinical pharmacology of tamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen in patients with advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1980; 5:109-11. [PubMed 7471314]



142. Fromson JM, Pearson S, Bramah S. The metabolism of tamoxifen (I.C.I. 46,474). Part I: in laboratory animals. Xenobiotica. 1973; 3:693-709. [PubMed 4361333]



143. Milano G, Etienne MC, Frenay M et al. Optimised analysis of tamoxifen and its main metabolites in the plasma and cytosol of mammary tumours. Br J Cancer. 1987; 55:509-12. [PubMed 3606944]



144. Daniel P, Gaskell SJ, Bishop H et al. Determination of tamoxifen and biologically active metabolites in human breast tumours and plasma. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1981; 17:1183-9. [PubMed 7199465]



145. Jordan VC. Metabolites of tamoxifen in animals and man: identification, pharmacology, and significance. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1982; 2:123-38. [PubMed 6184101]



146. Soininen K, Kleimola T, Elomaa I et al. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen and its metabolites in breast cancer patients. J Int Med Res. 1986; 14:162-5. [PubMed 3522312]



147. Ribeiro GG, Wilkinson PM. A clinical assessment of loading dose tamoxifen for advanced breast carcinoma. Clin Oncol. 1984; 10:363-7. [PubMed 6509818]



148. Adam HK, Douglas EJ, Kemp JV. The metabolism of tamoxifen in humans. Biochem Pharmacol. 1979; 27:145-7.



149. Bain RR, Jordan VC. Identification of a new metabolite of tamoxifen in patient serum during breast cancer therapy. Biochem Pharmacol. 1983; 32:373-5. [PubMed 6870963]



150. Jordan VC, Bain RR, Brown RR et al. Determination and pharmacology of a new hydroxylated metabolite of tamoxifen observed in patient sera during therapy for advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1983; 43:1446-50. [IDIS 165659] [PubMed 6825112]



151. Murphy C, Fotsis T, Pantzar P et al. Analysis of tamoxifen and its metabolites in human plasma by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using selected ion monitoring (SIM). J Steroid Biochem. 1987; 26:547-55. [PubMed 3586671]



152. Kemp JV, Adam HK, Wakeling AE et al. Identification and biological activity of tamoxifen and metabolites in human serum. Biochem Pharmacol. 1983; 32:2045-52. [PubMed 6870933]



153. Jordan VC, Collins MM, Rowsby L et al. A monohydroxylated metabolite of tamoxifen with potent antioestrogenic activity. J Endocrinol. 1977; 75:305-16. [PubMed 591813]



154. Wakeling AE, Slater SR. Estrogen-receptor binding and biologic activity of tamoxifen and its metabolites. Cancer Treat Rep. 1980; 64:741-4. [PubMed 7427959]



155. Fabian C, Tilzer L, Sternson L. Comparative binding affinities of tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, and desmethyltamoxifen for estrogen receptors isolated from human breast carcinoma: correlation with blood levels in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1981; 2:381-90. [IDIS 143191] [PubMed 7317574]



156. Borgna JL, Rochefort H. Hydroxylated metabolites of tamoxifen are formed in vivo and bound to estrogen receptor in target tissues. J Biol Chem. 1981; 256:859-68. [PubMed 7451477]



157. Coezy E, Borgna JL, Rochefort H. Tamoxifen and metabolites in MCF, cells: correlation between binding to estrogen receptor and inhibition of cell growth. Cancer Res. 1982; 42:317-23. [PubMed 7053859]



158. Pritchard KI, Thomson DB, Myers RE et al. Tamoxifen therapy in premenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rep. 1980; 64:787-96. [PubMed 7427962]



159. Manni A, Pearson OH. Antiestrogen-induced remissions in premenopausal women with stage IV breast cancer: effects on ovarian function. Cancer Treat Rep. 1980; 64:779-85. [PubMed 6775808]



160. Sawka CA, Pritchard KI, Paterson AH et al. Role and mechanism of action of tamoxifen in premenopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1986; 46:3152-6. [IDIS 217168] [PubMed 3084082]



161. Ingle JN, Krook JE, Green SJ et al. Randomized trial of bilateral oophorectomy versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1986; 4:178-85. [PubMed 3511184]



162. Buchanan RB, Blamey RW, Durrant KR et al. A randomized comparison of tamoxifen with surgical oophorectomy in premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1986; 4:1326-30. [PubMed 3528402]



163. Legha SS. Tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1988; 109:219-28. [IDIS 244745] [PubMed 3291659]



164. Hoogstraten B, Fletcher WS, Gad-el-Mawla N et al. Tamoxifen and oophorectomy in the treatment of recurrent breast cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer Res. 1982; 42:4788-91. [IDIS 159551] [PubMed 7127314]



165. Yoshida M, Murai H, Miura S. Tamoxifen therapy for premenopausal and postmenopausal Japanese females with advanced breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1982; 12:57-63.



166. Margreiter R, Wiegele J. Tamoxifen (Nolvadex) for premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1984; 4:45-8. [PubMed 6365211]



167. Planting AS, Alexieva-Figusch J, Blonk-VdWijst J et al. Tamoxifen therapy in premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 1985; 69:363-8.



168. Wada T, Koyama H, Terasawa T. Effect of tamoxifen in premenopausal Japanese women with advanced breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rep. 1981; 65:728-9. [IDIS 137005] [PubMed 7248991]



169. Hoogstraten B, Gad-el-Mawla N, Maloney TR et al. Combined modality therapy for first recurrence of breast cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer. 1984; 54:2248-56. [IDIS 193333] [PubMed 6488144]



170. Lodwick R, McConkey B, Brown AM. Life threatening interaction between tamoxifen and warfarin. BMJ. 1987; 295:1141. [IDIS 235136] [PubMed 3120919]



171. Tenni P, Lalich DL, Byrne MJ. Life threatening interaction between tamoxifen and warfarin. BMJ. 1989; 298:93. [IDIS 249683] [PubMed 2493305]



172. Ritchie LD, Grant SMT. Tamoxifen–Warfarin interaction: the Aberdeen hospitals drug file. BMJ. 1989; 298:1253.



173. Fornander T, Rutquist LE, Cedermark B et al. Adjuvant tamoxifen in early breast cancer: occurrence of new primary cancers. Lancet. 1989; 1:117-20. [IDIS 249801] [PubMed 2563046]



174. Hardell L. Tamoxifen as risk factor for carcinoma of corpus uteri. Lancet. 1988; 2:563. [IDIS 245548] [PubMed 2900934]



175. Killackey MA, Hakes TB, Pierce VK. Endometrial adenocarcinoma in breast cancer patients receiving antiestrogens. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985; 69:237-8. [IDIS 196903] [PubMed 3971394]



176. Jordan VC. Tamoxifen and endometrial cancer. Lancet. 1989; 1:733-4. [IDIS 254039] [PubMed 2564550]



177. Gottardis MM, Robinson SP, Satyaswaroop PG et al. Contrasting actions of tamoxifen on endometrial and breast tumor growth in the athymic mouse. Cancer Res. 1988; 48:812-5. [PubMed 3338079]



178. Neven P, De Muylder X, Van Belle Y et al. Tamoxifen and the uterus and endometrium. Lancet. 1989; 1:375. [IDIS 250800] [PubMed 2563519]



179. Stewart HJ, Knight GM. Tamoxifen and the uterus and endometrium. Lancet. 1989; 1:375-6. [PubMed 18446929]



180. Cano A, Matallin P, Legua V et al. Tamoxifen and the uterus and endometrium. Lancet. 1989; 1:376. [PubMed 18446930]



181. Boccardo F, Bruzzi P, Rubagotti A et al. Estrogen-like action of tamoxifen on vaginal epithelium in breast cancer patients. Oncology. 1981; 38:281-5. [PubMed 7266969]



182. Boccardo F, Guarneri D, Rubagotti A et al. Endocrine effects of tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Tumori. 1984; 70:61-8. [PubMed 6538707]



183. Buckley MMT, Goa KL. Tamoxifen: a reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use. Drugs. 1989; 37:451-90. [IDIS 257967] [PubMed 2661195]



184. Cuzick J, Baum M. Tamoxifen and contralateral breast cancer. Lancet. 1985; 2:282. [IDIS 203072] [PubMed 2862460]



185. Brun LD, Gagne C, Rousseau C et al. Severe lipemia induced by tamoxifen. Cancer. 1986; 57:2123-6. [IDIS 216127] [PubMed 3697911]



186. Noguchi M, Taniya T, Tajiri K et al. Fatal hyperlipaemia in a case of metastatic breast cancer treated by tamoxifen. Br J Surg. 1987; 74:586-7. [PubMed 3620865]



187. Taniya T, Noguchi M, Tajiri K et al. [A case report of hyperlipemia with giant fatty liver during adjuvant endocrine therapy by tamoxifen]. Gan No Rinsho. 1987; 33:300-4. [PubMed 3108557]



188. Rossner S, Wallgren A. Serum lipoproteins and proteins after breast cancer surgery and effects of tamoxifen. Atherosclerosis. 1984; 52:339-46. [PubMed 6497936]



189. McKeown CA, Swartz M, Blom J et al. Tamoxifen retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981; 65:177-9. [PubMed 7225310]



190. Vinding T, Nielsen NV. Retinopathy caused by treatment with tamoxifen in low dosage. Acta Ophthalmol. 1983; 61:45-50.



191. Griffiths MF. Tamoxifen retinopathy at low dosage. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987; 104:185-6. [IDIS 232920] [PubMed 3039846]



192. Ashford AR, Donev I, Tiwari RP et al. Reversible ocular toxicity related to tamoxifen therapy. Cancer. 1988; 61:33-5. [IDIS 237645] [PubMed 3334951]



193. Pugesgaard T, Von Eyben FE. Bilateral optic neuritis evolved during tamoxifen treatment. Cancer. 1986; 58:383-6. [IDIS 218074] [PubMed 3719532]



194. National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research. Consensus conference: treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991; 265:391-5. [PubMed 1984541]



195. Fisher B, Redmond C, Wickerham L et al. Systemic therapy in patients with node-negative breast cancer: a commentary based on two national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP) clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 1989; 111:703-12. [IDIS 260416] [PubMed 2679288]



196. Fisher B, Costantino J, Redmond C et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating tamoxifen in the treatment of patients with node-negative breast cancer who have estrogen-receptor-positive tumors. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320:479-84. [IDIS 308825] [PubMed 2644532]



197. Rosner D, Lane WW. One-third of node-negative breast cancer patients are highly curable by surgery alone, without need for adjuvant systemic therapy. Proc Annu Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1990; 9:A63.



198. Redmond CK, Fisher B, Costantino J et al. Treatment of stage I breast cancer: the NSABP experience. Horm Res. 1989; 32(Suppl 1):175-80. [PubMed 2613203]



199. Hillner BE, Smith TJ. Efficacy and cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324:160-8. [IDIS 276489] [PubMed 1898533]



200. Anon. Adjuvant tamoxifen in early breast cancer. Lancet. 1987; 2:191-2. [PubMed 2885643]



201. McGuire WL. Adjuvant therapy of node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320:525-7. [PubMed 2915655]



202. DeVita VT Jr. Breast cancer therapy: exercising all our options. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320:527-9. [PubMed 2915656]



203. Wolmark N. 1989: The year of adjuvant therapy in node-negative breast cancer. Cancer: Princ Pract Oncol Updates. 1989; 3:1-10.



204. Anon. Tamoxifen for node-negative breast cancer. FDA Drug Bull. 1990; 20:5.



205. Bianco AR, De Placido S, Gallo C et al. Adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen in operable breast cancer. Lancet. 1988; 2:1095-9. [IDIS 247823] [PubMed 2903322]



206. McGuire WL. Adjuvant therapy of node-negative breast cancer: another point of view. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988; 80:1075-6. [

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Xgeva





1. Name Of The Medicinal Product



XGEVA®


2. Qualitative And Quantitative Composition



Each vial contains 120 mg of denosumab in 1.7 ml of solution (70 mg/ml).



Denosumab is a human monoclonal IgG2 antibody produced in a mammalian cell line (CHO) by recombinant DNA technology.



Excipients with known effects:



Each 1.7 ml of solution contains 78 mg sorbitol (E420).



For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1.



3. Pharmaceutical Form



Solution for injection (injection).



Clear, colourless to slightly yellow solution and may contain trace amounts of translucent to white proteinaceous particles.



4. Clinical Particulars



4.1 Therapeutic Indications



Prevention of skeletal related events (pathological fracture, radiation to bone, spinal cord compression or surgery to bone) in adults with bone metastases from solid tumours.



4.2 Posology And Method Of Administration



Posology



The recommended dose of XGEVA is 120 mg administered as a single subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks into the thigh, abdomen or upper arm.



Supplementation of at least 500 mg calcium and 400 IU vitamin D is required in all patients, unless hypercalcaemia is present (see section 4.4).



Patients with renal impairment



No dose adjustment is required in patients with renal impairment (see section 5.2). Experience in patients on dialysis or with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min) is limited.



Patients with hepatic impairment



The safety and efficacy of denosumab have not been studied in patients with hepatic impairment (see section 5.2).



Elderly patients (age



No dose adjustment is required in elderly patients (see section 5.2).



Paediatric population



XGEVA is not recommended in paediatric patients (age < 18) as the safety and efficacy of XGEVA in these patients have not been established. Inhibition of RANK/RANK ligand (RANKL) in animal studies has been coupled to inhibition of bone growth and lack of tooth eruption, and these changes were partially reversible upon cessation of RANKL inhibition (see section 5.3).



Method of administration



For subcutaneous use.



XGEVA should be administered under the responsibility of a healthcare professional.



The instructions for use, handling and disposal are given in section 6.6.



4.3 Contraindications



Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients.



Severe, untreated hypocalcaemia (see section 4.4).



4.4 Special Warnings And Precautions For Use



Calcium and Vitamin D supplementation



Supplementation with calcium and vitamin D is required in all patients unless hypercalcaemia is present (see section 4.2).



Hypocalcaemia



Pre-existing hypocalcaemia must be corrected prior to initiating therapy with XGEVA.



Patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min) or receiving dialysis are at greater risk of developing hypocalcaemia. Monitoring of calcium levels in these patients is recommended. If hypocalcaemia occurs while receiving XGEVA, additional short term calcium supplementation may be necessary.



Osteonecrosis of the jaw



Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was reported in patients treated with denosumab, predominantly in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone (see section 4.8).



Patients who developed ONJ in clinical studies generally had known risk factors for ONJ, including invasive dental procedures (e.g., tooth extraction, dental implants, oral surgery), poor oral hygiene or other pre-existing dental disease, advanced malignancies, infections, or concomitant therapies (e.g., chemotherapy, corticosteroids, angiogenesis inhibitors, radiotherapy to the head and neck). A dental examination with appropriate preventive dentistry should be considered prior to treatment with XGEVA in patients with active dental and jaw conditions (as listed above). While on treatment, patients should avoid invasive dental procedures if possible.



Good oral hygiene practices should be maintained during treatment with XGEVA. Patients who are suspected of having or who develop ONJ while on XGEVA therapy should receive care by a dentist or oral surgeon. In these patients, extensive dental surgery to treat ONJ may exacerbate the condition.



An individual risk/benefit evaluation should be done for each patient before prescribing XGEVA in patients with unavoidable risk factors for ONJ; and in patients who have developed ONJ during treatment with XGEVA.



Skin infections leading to hospitalisation (predominantly cellulitis)



In clinical trials in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone, skin infections leading to hospitalisation (predominantly cellulitis) were reported (see section 4.8). Patients should be advised to seek prompt medical attention if they develop signs or symptoms of cellulitis.



Others



Patients being treated with XGEVA should not be treated concomitantly with other denosumab containing medicinal products (for osteoporosis indications).



Patients being treated with XGEVA should not be treated concomitantly with bisphosphonates.



Warnings for excipients



Patients with rare hereditary problems of fructose intolerance should not use XGEVA.



4.5 Interaction With Other Medicinal Products And Other Forms Of Interaction



No interaction studies have been performed.



In clinical trials, XGEVA has been administered in combination with standard anti-cancer treatment and in subjects previously receiving bisphosphonates. There were no clinically-relevant alterations in trough serum concentration and pharmacodynamics of denosumab (creatinine adjusted urinary N-telopeptide, uNTx/Cr) by concomitant chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy or by previous intravenous bisphosphonate exposure.



4.6 Pregnancy And Lactation



Pregnancy



There are no adequate data from the use of XGEVA in pregnant women. Animal studies are insufficient with respect to reproductive toxicity (see section 5.3). In genetically engineered mice in which RANKL has been turned off by gene removal (a “knockout mouse”), studies suggest absence of RANKL (the target of denosumab – see section 5.1) could interfere with the development of lymph nodes in the foetus and could lead to postnatal impairment of dentition and bone growth (see section 5.3). XGEVA is not recommended for use in pregnant women and women of childbearing potential not using contraception.



Breast-feeding



It is unknown whether denosumab is excreted in human milk. Knockout mouse studies suggest absence of RANKL during pregnancy may interfere with maturation of the mammary gland leading to impaired lactation post-partum (see section 5.3). A decision on whether to abstain from breast-feeding or to abstain from therapy with XGEVA should be made, taking into account the benefit of breast-feeding to the newborn/infant and the benefit of XGEVA therapy to the woman.



Fertility



No data are available on the effect of denosumab on human fertility. Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to fertility (see section 5.3).



4.7 Effects On Ability To Drive And Use Machines



XGEVA has no or negligible influence on the ability to drive and use machines.



4.8 Undesirable Effects



Summary of the safety profile



The safety of XGEVA was evaluated in 5,931 patients with advanced malignancies involving bone and is derived from active-controlled, clinical trials examining the efficacy and safety of XGEVA versus zoledronic acid in preventing the occurrence of skeletal related events. The adverse reactions are presented in table 1.



Tabulated list of adverse reactions



The following convention has been used for the classification of the adverse reactions reported in three phase III and one phase II clinical studies (see table 1): very common (



Table 1 Adverse reactions reported in three phase III and one phase II active-controlled clinical studies in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone


































MedDRA system organ class




Frequency category




Adverse reactions




Infections and infestations




Uncommon




Cellulitis1




Immune system disorder




Uncommon




Drug hypersensitivity




Metabolism and nutrition disorders




Common




Hypocalcaemia1




Common




Hypophosphataemia


 


Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders




Very common




Dyspnoea




Gastrointestinal disorders




Very common




Diarrhoea




Common




Tooth extraction


 


Skin and subcutaneous tissues disorders




Common




Hyperhidrosis




Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders




Common




Osteonecrosis of the jaw1



1 See section Description of selected adverse reactions



Description of selected adverse reactions



Hypocalcaemia



In three phase III active-controlled clinical trials in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone, hypocalcaemia was reported in 9.6% of patients treated with XGEVA and 5.0% of patients treated with zoledronic acid.



A grade 3 decrease in serum calcium levels was experienced in 2.5% of patients treated with XGEVA and 1.2% of patients treated with zoledronic acid. A grade 4 decrease in serum calcium levels was experienced in 0.6% of patients treated with XGEVA and 0.2% of patients treated with zoledronic acid (see section 4.4).



Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)



In three phase III active-controlled clinical trials in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone, ONJ was confirmed in 1.8% of patients treated with XGEVA and 1.3% of patients treated with zoledronic acid. Clinical characteristics of these cases were similar between treatment groups. Among subjects with confirmed ONJ, most (81% in both treatment groups) had a history of tooth extraction, poor oral hygiene, and/or use of a dental appliance. In addition most subjects were receiving or had received chemotherapy (see section 4.4). Patients with certain identified risk factors for ONJ were excluded from participation in the pivotal studies (see section 5.1).



Skin infections (predominantly cellulitis) leading to hospitalisation



In three phase III active-controlled clinical trials in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone, skin infections leading to hospitalisation (predominantly cellulitis) were reported more frequently in patients receiving XGEVA (0.9%) compared with zoledronic acid (0.7%).



In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, skin infections leading to hospitalisation were reported for 0.4% women receiving Prolia® (denosumab 60 mg every 6 months) and for 0.1% women receiving placebo (see section 4.4).



Other special populations



In a clinical study of patients without advanced cancer with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min) or receiving dialysis, there was a greater risk of developing hypocalcaemia in the absence of calcium supplementation.



4.9 Overdose



There is no experience with overdose in clinical studies. XGEVA has been administered in clinical studies using doses up to 180 mg every 4 weeks and 120 mg weekly for 3 weeks.



5. Pharmacological Properties



5.1 Pharmacodynamic Properties



Pharmacotherapeutic group: Drugs for the treatment of bone diseases – other drugs affecting bone structure and mineralisation, ATC code: M05BX04



Mechanism of action



RANKL exists as a transmembrane or soluble protein. RANKL is essential for the formation, function and survival of osteoclasts, the sole cell type responsible for bone resorption. Increased osteoclast activity, stimulated by RANKL, is a key mediator of bone destruction in metastatic bone disease and multiple myeloma. Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody (IgG2) that targets and binds with high affinity and specificity to RANKL, preventing the RANKL/RANK interaction from occurring and resulting in reduced osteoclast numbers and function, thereby decreasing bone resorption and cancer-induced bone destruction.



Pharmacodynamic effects



In phase II clinical studies of patients with advanced malignancies involving bone, subcutaneous (SC) dosing of XGEVA administered either every 4 weeks or every 12 weeks resulted in a rapid reduction in markers of bone resorption (uNTx/Cr, serum CTx), with median reductions of approximately 80% for uNTx/Cr occurring within 1 week regardless of prior bisphosphonate therapy or baseline uNTx/Cr level. In the phase III clinical trials, median reductions of approximately 80% were maintained in uNTx/Cr after 3 months of treatment in 2075 XGEVA-treated advanced cancer patients naïve to IV-bisphosphonate.



Immunogenicity



In clinical studies, neutralising antibodies have not been observed for XGEVA. Using a sensitive immunoassay < 1% of patients treated with denosumab for up to 3 years tested positive for non neutralising binding antibodies with no evidence of altered pharmacokinetics, toxicity, or clinical response.



Clinical efficacy in patients with bone metastases from solid tumours



Efficacy and safety of 120 mg XGEVA SC every 4 weeks or 4 mg zoledronic acid (dose-adjusted for reduced renal function) IV every 4 weeks were compared in three randomised, double blind, active controlled studies, in IV-bisphosphonate naïve patients with advanced malignancies involving bone: adults with breast cancer (study 1), other solid tumours or multiple myeloma (study 2), and castrate-resistant prostate cancer (study 3). Patients with prior history of ONJ or osteomyelitis of the jaw, an active dental or jaw condition requiring oral surgery, non-healed dental/oral surgery, or any planned invasive dental procedure, were not eligible for inclusion in these studies. The primary and secondary endpoints evaluated the occurrence of one or more skeletal related events (SREs).



XGEVA reduced the risk of developing a SRE, and developing multiple SREs (first and subsequent) in patients with bone metastases from solid tumours (see table 2).



Table 2: Efficacy results in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone










































































































































































































 




Study 1



breast cancer




Study 2



other solid tumours** or multiple myeloma




Study 3



prostate cancer




Combined advanced cancer


    

 


XGEVA




zoledronic acid




XGEVA




zoledronic acid




XGEVA




zoledronic acid




XGEVA




zoledronic acid




N




1026




1020




886




890




950




951




2862




2861




First SRE


        


Median time (months)




NR




26.4




20.6




16.3




20.7




17.1




27.6




19.4




Difference in median time (months)




NA




4.2




3.5




8.2


    


HR (95% CI) / RRR (%)




0.82 (0.71, 0.95) / 18




0.84 (0.71, 0.98) / 16




0.82 (0.71, 0.95) / 18




0.83 (0.76, 0.90) / 17


    


Non-inferiority / Superiority p-values




< 0.0001/ 0.0101




0.0007 / 0.0619




0.0002 / 0.0085




< 0.0001 / < 0.0001


    


Proportion of subjects (%)




30.7




36.5




31.4




36.3




35.9




40.6




32.6




37.8




First and subsequent SRE*


        


Mean number/patient




0.46




0.60




0.44




0.49




0.52




0.61




0.48




0.57




Rate ratio (95% CI) / RRR (%)




0.77 (0.66, 0.89) / 23




0.90 (0.77, 1.04) / 10




0.82 (0.71, 0.94) / 18




0.82 (0.75, 0.89) / 18


    


Superiority p-value




0.0012




0.1447




0.0085




< 0.0001


    


SMR per Year




0.45




0.58




0.86




1.04




0.79




0.83




0.69




0.81




First SRE or HCM


        


Median time (months)




NR




25.2




19.0




14.4




20.3




17.1




26.6




19.4




HR (95% CI) / RRR (%)




0.82 (0.70, 0.95) / 18




0.83 (0.71, 0.97) / 17




0.83 (0.72, 0.96) / 17




0.83 (0.76, 0.90) / 17


    


Superiority p-value




0.0074




0.0215




0.0134




< 0.0001


    


First radiation to bone


        


Median time (months)




NR




NR




NR




NR




NR




28.6




NR




33.2




HR (95% CI) / RRR (%)




0.74 (0.59, 0.94) / 26




0.78 (0.63, 0.97) / 22




0.78 (0.66, 0.94) / 22




0.77 (0.69, 0.87) / 23


    


Superiority p-value




0.0121




0.0256




0.0071




< 0.0001


    


NR = not reached; NA = not available; HCM = hypercalcaemia of malignancy; SMR = skeletal morbidity rate; HR = Hazard Ratio; RRR = Relative Risk Reduction †Adjusted p-values are presented for Studies 1, 2 and 3 (first SRE and first and subsequent SRE endpoints); *Accounts for all skeletal events over time; only events occurring



** Including NSCLC, renal cell cancer, colorectal cancer, small cell lung cancer, bladder cancer, head and neck cancer, GI/genitourinary cancer and others, excluding breast and prostate cancer



Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier plots of time to first on-study SRE





Disease progression and overall survival



Disease progression was similar between XGEVA and zoledronic acid in all three studies and in the pre-specified analysis of all three-studies combined.



In all three studies overall survival was balanced between XGEVA and zoledronic acid in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone: patients with breast cancer (hazard ratio and 95% CI was 0.95 [0.81, 1.11]), patients with prostate cancer (hazard ratio and 95% CI was 1.03 [0.91, 1.17]), and patients with other solid tumours or multiple myeloma (hazard ratio and 95% CI was 0.95 [0.83, 1.08]). A post-hoc analysis in study 2 (patients with other solid tumours or multiple myeloma) examined overall survival for the 3 tumour types used for stratification (non-small cell lung cancer, multiple myeloma, and other). Overall survival was longer for XGEVA in non-small cell lung cancer (hazard ratio [95% CI] of 0.79 [0.65, 0.95]; n = 702) and longer for zoledronic acid in multiple myeloma (hazard ratio [95% CI] of 2.26 [1.13, 4.50]; n = 180) and similar between XGEVA and zoledronic acid in other tumour types (hazard ratio [95% CI] of 1.08 (0.90, 1.30); n = 894). This study did not control for prognostic factors and anti-neoplastic treatments. In a combined pre-specified analysis from studies 1, 2 and 3, overall survival was similar between XGEVA and zoledronic acid (hazard ratio and 95% CI 0.99 [0.91, 1.07]) (see section 4.4).



Effect on pain



The time to pain improvement (i.e.,



Paediatric population



The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with XGEVA in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in bone metastases (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).



5.2 Pharmacokinetic Properties



Following SC administration, bioavailability was 62% and denosumab displayed non-linear pharmacokinetics with dose over a wide dose range, but approximately dose-proportional increases in exposure for doses of 60 mg (or 1 mg/kg) and higher. The non-linearity is likely due to a saturable target-mediated elimination pathway of importance at low concentrations.



With multiple doses of 120 mg every 4 weeks an approximate 2-fold accumulation in serum denosumab concentrations was observed and steady-state was achieved by 6 months, consistent with time-independent pharmacokinetics. In subjects who discontinued 120 mg every 4 weeks, the mean half-life was 28 days (range 14 to 55 days).



A population pharmacokinetic analysis did not indicate clinically significant changes in the systemic exposure of denosumab at steady state with respect to age (18 to 87 years), race/ethnicity (Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Caucasians explored), gender or solid tumour types. Increasing body weight was associated with decreases in systemic exposure, and vice versa. The alterations were not considered clinically relevant, since pharmacodynamic effects based on bone turnover markers were consistent across a wide range of body weight.



Denosumab is composed solely of amino acids and carbohydrates as native immunoglobulin and is unlikely to be eliminated via hepatic metabolic mechanisms. Its metabolism and elimination are expected to follow the immunoglobulin clearance pathways, resulting in degradation to small peptides and individual amino acids.



Special populations



No overall differences in safety or efficacy were observed between geriatric patients and younger patients. Controlled clinical studies of XGEVA in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone over age 65 revealed similar efficacy and safety in older and younger patients. No dose adjustment is required in elderly patients.



In a study of 55 patients without advanced cancer but with varying degrees of renal function, including patients on dialysis, the degree of renal impairment had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of denosumab. There is no need for renal monitoring when receiving XGEVA.



No specific study in patients with hepatic impairment was performed. In general, monoclonal antibodies are not eliminated via hepatic metabolic mechanisms. The pharmacokinetics of denosumab is not expected to be affected by hepatic impairment.



The pharmacokinetic profile in paediatric populations has not been assessed.



5.3 Preclinical Safety Data



Since the biological activity of denosumab in animals is specific to nonhuman primates, evaluation of genetically engineered (knockout) mice or use of other biological inhibitors of the RANK/RANKL pathway, such as OPG-Fc and RANK-Fc, were used to evaluate the pharmacodynamic properties of denosumab in rodent models.



In mouse bone metastasis models of oestrogen receptor positive and negative human breast cancer, prostate cancer and non small cell lung cancer, OPG-Fc reduced osteolytic, osteoblastic, and osteolytic/osteoblastic lesions, delayed formation of de novo bone metastases, and reduced skeletal tumour growth. When OPG-Fc was combined with hormonal therapy (tamoxifen) or chemotherapy (docetaxel) in these models, there was additive inhibition of skeletal tumour growth in breast, and prostate or lung cancer respectively. In a mouse model of mammary tumour induction, RANK-Fc reduced hormone-induced proliferation in mammary epithelium and delayed tumour formation.



Standard tests to investigate the genotoxicity potential of denosumab have not been evaluated, since such tests are not relevant for this molecule. However, due to its character it is unlikely that denosumab has any potential for genotoxicity.



The carcinogenic potential of denosumab has not been evaluated in long-term animal studies.



In single and repeated dose toxicity studies in cynomolgus monkeys, denosumab doses resulting in 2.7 to 15 times greater systemic exposure than the recommended human dose had no impact on cardiovascular physiology, male or female fertility, or produced specific target organ toxicity. In an embryofoetal developmental study in cynomolgus monkeys, denosumab doses resulting in 9 times greater systemic exposure than the recommended human dose did not induce maternal toxicity or foetal harm during a period equivalent to the first trimester, although foetal lymph nodes were not examined (see section 4.6). During the second and third trimesters, when denosumab is expected to cross the placenta, potential maternal and foetal toxicity have not been assessed.



In preclinical bone quality studies in monkeys on long-term denosumab treatment, decreases in bone turnover were associated with improvement in bone strength and normal bone histology.



In male mice genetically engineered to express huRANKL (knock-in mice), which were subjected to a transcortical fracture, denosumab delayed the removal of cartilage and remodelling of the fracture callus compared to control, but biomechanical strength was not adversely affected.



In preclinical studies knockout mice lacking RANK or RANKL had an absence of lactation due to inhibition of mammary gland maturation (lobulo-alveolar gland development during pregnancy) and exhibited impairment of lymph node formation. Neonatal RANK/RANKL knockout mice exhibited decreased body weight, reduced bone growth, altered growth plates and lack of tooth eruption. Reduced bone growth, altered growth plates and impaired tooth eruption were also seen in studies of neonatal rats administered RANKL inhibitors, and these changes were partially reversible when dosing of RANKL inhibitor was discontinued. Adolescent primates dosed with denosumab at 2.7 and 15 times (10 and 50 mg/kg dose) the clinical exposure had abnormal growth plates. Therefore, treatment with denosumab may impair bone growth in children with open growth plates and may inhibit eruption of dentition.



6. Pharmaceutical Particulars



6.1 List Of Excipients



Acetic acid, glacial*



Sodium hydroxide (for pH adjustment)*



Sorbitol (E420)



Water for injections



* Acetate buffer is formed by mixing acetic acid with sodium hydroxide



6.2 Incompatibilities



In the absence of compatibility studies, this medicinal product must not be mixed with other medicinal products.



6.3 Shelf Life



3 years.



XGEVA may be stored at room temperature (up to 25°C) for up to 30 days in the original container. Once removed from the refrigerator, XGEVA must be used within this 30 day period.



6.4 Special Precautions For Storage



Store in a refrigerator (2°C – 8°C).



Do not freeze.



Keep the vial in the outer carton in order to protect from light.



6.5 Nature And Contents Of Container



1.7 ml solution in a single use vial (type I glass) with stopper (fluoropolymer coated elastomeric) and seal (aluminium) with flip-off cap.



Pack size of one or four.



Not all pack sizes may be marketed.



6.6 Special Precautions For Disposal And Other Handling



Before administration, the XGEVA solution should be inspected visually. The solution may contain trace amounts of translucent to white proteinaceous particles. Do not inject the solution if it is cloudy or discoloured. Do not shake excessively. To avoid discomfort at the site of injection, allow the vial to reach room temperature (up to 25ºC) before injecting and inject slowly. Inject the entire contents of the vial. A 27 gauge needle is recommended for the administration of denosumab. Do not re-enter the vial.



Any unused product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.



7. Marketing Authorisation Holder



Amgen Europe B.V.



Minervum 7061



NL-4817 ZK Breda



The Netherlands



8. Marketing Authorisation Number(S)



EU/1/11/703/001



EU/1/11/703/002



9. Date Of First Authorisation/Renewal Of The Authorisation



13 July 2011



10. Date Of Revision Of The Text



XGEVA is a registered trademark of Amgen Inc.



Detailed information on this medicinal product is available on the website of the European Medicines Agency http://www.ema.europa.eu/.